The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) stands at a pivotal moment, its reputation on the line as it prepares to make a landmark decision in one of its most high-profile cases yet. The forthcoming verdict on Lucy Letby's conviction for murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others will be closely watched, not just because of the gravity of her alleged crimes, but also due to the intense public scrutiny, expert criticism of the prosecution's case, and an upcoming report from a public inquiry.
Less than two years ago, the CCRC's ability to handle such complex cases was in question. The organisation had faced severe criticism for its handling of cases like Andrew Malkinson, who spent 17 years wrongly imprisoned for rape, and Peter Sullivan, who was wrongly incarcerated for 38 years for murder. Both men had previously applied to the CCRC before their convictions were overturned. A review into Mr Malkinson's case highlighted concerns that inquiries 'drifted', while the Justice Select Committee noted the organisation's apparent inability to learn from its past mistakes. The departure of both its chair and chief executive in the first half of last year raised further doubts about its capacity for change.
However, under the interim leadership of Dame Vera Baird, the CCRC has taken steps towards rebuilding trust. A recent report from the Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate provided 34 recommendations for improvement, including addressing issues like unclear roles and responsibilities, unacceptable delays, and a need for enhanced training. The inspectorate expressed confidence in the organisation's casework, stating that all decisions in the 60 examined cases were 'ultimately sound'. This is reflected in current outcomes, with 77.8% of CCRC referrals leading to convictions being overturned this year – although this proportion has fluctuated previously.
The CCRC was established in response to a series of miscarriages of justice investigated by a royal commission in the 1990s. As an independent body, it serves as a vital backstop to the criminal justice system in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, providing a 'place of last resort' for individuals whose appeals have been exhausted. Its existence acknowledges the inherent fallibility of the justice system, with some cases relying on forensic evidence unavailable at their original trials.
As the CCRC faces a record surge in applications – 1,841 received in the 2025-26 financial year, an increase of nearly 20% from the preceding year – it is clear that the organisation remains vigilant against complacency. The inspectors' conclusion that the CCRC is not a 'failing organisation' should offer reassurance to those who rely on its work.