Renowned author and technologist Cory Doctorow has labelled the idea of 'sovereign AI' as 'nonsense', arguing that global efforts should instead concentrate on establishing sovereign applications and data centres. Doctorow, widely known for coining the term 'enshittification' to describe the degradation of online platforms, made his remarks in the context of a changing geopolitical landscape, specifically citing the perceived dismantling of the US-led world order.
Doctorow's critique suggests that while nations may aspire to develop their own artificial intelligence capabilities independently, the real strategic advantage and control lie at the foundational levels of technology infrastructure. He implies that without control over the applications used daily and the physical locations where data is stored and processed, true digital sovereignty remains elusive, regardless of who develops the AI models themselves.
The argument for sovereign applications and data centres reflects a growing global concern about data privacy, national security, and economic independence in the digital age. Many countries, including the UK, have been exploring ways to reduce reliance on foreign-owned technology giants and ensure that sensitive data remains within their borders, subject to domestic laws and regulations. This ambition extends beyond just data storage to the software and services that underpin critical national infrastructure and public services.
Doctorow's perspective highlights a potential strategic misdirection, suggesting that simply focusing on AI development in isolation might overlook the broader ecosystem of digital control. As AI models become increasingly commoditised, the infrastructure and platforms upon which they operate could become the more critical battleground for national digital autonomy. This shift in focus could have significant implications for how governments and industries invest in and regulate technology.
The debate around digital sovereignty is particularly pertinent for the UK, which relies heavily on international technology providers. Ensuring data residency and control over critical applications is seen by some as essential for national resilience and security, especially in an era of heightened cyber threats and geopolitical instability. Doctorow's comments provide a thought-provoking challenge to conventional thinking about achieving technological independence.