The European Union has decided to allow wearable devices such as smartwatches and fitness trackers to sidestep new rules requiring user-replaceable batteries, a move that has divided industry and environmental campaigners. The exemption, confirmed this week, acknowledges that the miniaturisation of components makes it impractical for consumers to swap batteries themselves without specialist tools or training.
Under the EU's updated Battery Regulation, which came into force earlier this year, most portable electronics must be designed so that batteries can be removed and replaced by the end user. However, wearables have been granted a temporary reprieve, with officials noting that the compact nature of these devices means that a 'professional's touch' is often required to avoid damage. The exemption is expected to last for a defined period, with a review planned to assess technological progress.
For UK businesses, the decision creates a fresh regulatory headache. While the UK has its own post-Brexit product safety regime, many British manufacturers still export to the EU and must comply with its rules. The divergence means firms may need to produce separate product lines for the UK and European markets, potentially increasing costs. Smaller startups in the wearable tech space could be particularly affected, as they lack the resources to manage dual compliance.
Consumer groups have voiced concerns that the exemption could slow the shift towards more repairable devices, contributing to the growing problem of electronic waste. The UK's Information Commissioner's Office has not yet issued specific guidance on the exemption, but it is expected to examine the implications for consumer rights and data security, as non-replaceable batteries can make it harder to wipe personal data before disposal.
Experts warn that the decision may also influence the UK's own regulatory trajectory. Dr. Helen Carter, a technology policy analyst at the University of Cambridge, said: 'The UK government faces a choice: align with the EU to maintain market access for British firms, or strike out independently to prioritise repairability and sustainability. Either way, consumers could see higher prices or reduced choice in the short term.'
For now, UK manufacturers of wearables are advised to monitor the EU's review timeline closely, as any future tightening of the rules could require costly redesigns. The British government has not yet indicated whether it will follow the EU's lead or introduce its own, stricter requirements under the UK's product safety framework.