Facebook
Britain's News Portal
Around The Clock
BREAKING
Loading latest headlines…

Ex-Military Chief Urges 'Moscow Test' for Next PM Amid Defence Spending Debate

Former Chief of the Defence Staff, Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, has stressed that the UK's next Prime Minister, widely expected to be Andy Burnham, must prioritise national security and defence spending. He warned that current military capabilities are 'too bare' and risk undermining the UK's standing with NATO allies.

  • Admiral Sir Tony Radakin stated that future policies need a 'Moscow test' to assess their impact on UK's international standing.
  • He urged the next Prime Minister to act 'almost like a wartime prime minister' given current global threats.
  • The UK has pledged to increase defence spending to 3.5% of GDP by 2035, a commitment Sir Tony says must be met.
  • Two ministers recently resigned over concerns about insufficient investment in the upcoming Defence Investment Plan (DIP).

The warning bell has sounded for UK's defence capabilities as Sir Tony Radakin, former Chief of Defence Staff, urges the next Prime Minister to pass a "Moscow test" – a critical evaluation of their policy plans to ensure the nation maintains its international presence. Speaking on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme, Sir Tony delivered an unequivocal message: robust defence capabilities are essential in today's escalating global threats, and the current state of military resources is "too bare". His intervention comes as the Government prepares to unveil its long-awaited Defence Investment Plan (DIP) before the NATO summit in Turkey on 7th July.

Sir Tony's call for a "Moscow test" – which would scrutinise policy commitments to meet defence spending targets – was directed at both current and future leaders, including Labour leadership frontrunner Andy Burnham. He stressed that whoever takes office must honour the commitment to raise defence spending to 3.5% of GDP by 2035. In a direct message to Mr Burnham, Sir Tony said, "It is keep our country safe, acknowledge that you have this extraordinary responsibility – so you’re almost like a wartime prime minister at the moment."

The debate around defence funding has been marked by high-profile resignations, with Defence Secretary John Healey and Armed Forces Minister Al Carns stepping down earlier this month. The reports suggest the Ministry of Defence had requested an additional £28 billion by the end of the decade but was only offered £10 billion, prompting cuts in other government departments to fund the increase.

Sir Tony's warnings about underinvestment have been echoed by recent revelations on the operational impact. He highlighted that "stores," “maintenance,” and the availability of ships, aircraft, tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles are all "too bare". The failure to meet defence spending commitments could lead to significant strain on relationships with NATO allies, particularly the United States.

Amidst the ongoing funding negotiations, the Ministry of Defence announced that £500 million would be allocated to equip the UK's elite Commando Force with new boats as part of the DIP. Dan Jarvis, the new Defence Secretary, stated that the plan had been "refreshed" since Mr Healey’s departure and would prioritise delivering "new lethal strike drones" and other advanced equipment to front-line forces.

Mr Jarvis expressed confidence in the consistency of national security policies despite transition in leadership, asserting that Mr Burnham "understands the nature and complexity of the world we’re operating in, and national security will be, I know, the first priority of any Labour prime minister."

Why this matters: The UK's defence capabilities and spending directly impact national security and its standing on the global stage, especially within NATO. This debate highlights the critical choices the next government will face regarding resource allocation and international commitments.

What this means for you: What this means for you: Increased defence spending could lead to greater national security but may also necessitate budget cuts in other public services or potentially impact taxation. It reflects the UK's commitment to international alliances and its role in global stability.

Related Articles

Get the news that matters.

Join thousands of readers getting the best of British news straight to their inbox.