The Independent Football Regulator (IFR) is set to decline requests from prominent anti-discrimination organisation Kick It Out to assume a more significant role in advancing equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) across the sport. This decision comes after the IFR's second round of consultations regarding its licensing framework, indicating a narrower focus for the new body than some campaigners had hoped.
Kick It Out had specifically urged the IFR to incorporate clear targets for EDI into its regulatory responsibilities, aiming to drive meaningful change in football clubs' practices and representation. Their proposal sought to leverage the regulator's powers to ensure clubs actively work towards more inclusive environments, both on and off the pitch.
However, the IFR has opted against this expanded remit. While the precise reasons for the rejection have not been fully detailed, it suggests the regulator is prioritising its core mandate, which is understood to centre on financial sustainability, good governance, and protecting the heritage of English football clubs. This approach aligns with the initial government white paper that outlined the regulator's scope following the fan-led review.
The move is likely to disappoint organisations and campaigners who believe that systemic issues surrounding equality and diversity in football require robust regulatory oversight. They argue that without a strong, independent body holding clubs accountable for EDI targets, progress may remain slow or inconsistent across the professional game.
The IFR's establishment was a key recommendation of the fan-led review, spearheaded by Tracey Crouch MP, following concerns about financial mismanagement and the threat of breakaway leagues. Its powers are expected to include a licensing system for clubs in the top five tiers of English football, providing oversight on financial matters and club ownership.