Former professional tennis player Jim Courier has expressed his disappointment and frustration with the French Open chair umpire's decision to deny Casper Ruud the second set in his recent match against Joao Fonseca.
Ruud, the world number three, was seen to be in a strong position, but the chair umpire made a decisive ruling to deny him the set, giving Fonseca a crucial advantage in the match.
The match ultimately ended in favour of Fonseca, with the Portuguese tennis player winning in four sets to reach the quarter-finals of the French Open.
Courier, a former French Open champion, was critical of the chair umpire's decision, stating that it was 'unfair' and 'questionable'.
The controversy has sparked debate among tennis fans and pundits, with many questioning the chair umpire's decision-making.
The incident highlights the importance of impartial and fair decision-making in tennis, particularly at the highest level of competition.