Facebook
Britain's News Portal
Around The Clock
BREAKING
Loading latest headlines…

Gates Foundation had 30 meetings with Epstein despite staff warnings

An external review has revealed approximately 30 meetings occurred between Jeffrey Epstein and leaders at the Gates Foundation, including Bill Gates, between 2011 and 2014. This took place despite multiple warnings from foundation staff about the risks of associating with Epstein due to his prior conviction.

  • External review found around 30 meetings between Jeffrey Epstein and Gates Foundation personnel, including Bill Gates, from 2011 to 2014.
  • Foundation staff had raised concerns about associating with Epstein on multiple occasions due to his prior conviction.
  • The review found no evidence of foundation involvement in or knowledge of Epstein's criminal activities or that he was paid by the foundation.
  • Bill Gates has publicly expressed regret over his past association with Epstein.
  • The interactions reportedly ended in December 2014.

A new external review commissioned by the Gates Foundation has uncovered that approximately 30 meetings took place between disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein and leaders and staff of the foundation, including co-founder Bill Gates, between 2011 and 2014. This occurred despite numerous instances where foundation staff reportedly raised concerns about the risks of associating with Epstein due to his previous conviction.

The review, conducted by the law firm WilmerHale, was initiated in March 2026 following the US Justice Department's release earlier this year of extensive documents related to Epstein. These files included references to Mr. Gates and photographs, prompting renewed scrutiny of his past connections to Epstein. The foundation had previously acknowledged awareness of emails between Epstein and its staff, expressing regret for any employee interactions.

The report's summary, released this week, concluded after approximately five months of investigation, which involved over 50 interviews with current and former foundation personnel, including Mr. Gates. It also reviewed extensive written materials. Crucially, WilmerHale stated it found no evidence of participation in or knowledge of Epstein's sex trafficking operations or other criminal activities by the foundation. Furthermore, the review found no indication that the foundation was aware of Epstein using its name to further his conduct, nor any evidence that Epstein received payments from the foundation.

Mr. Gates, who has not faced accusations of wrongdoing concerning Epstein, has consistently denied any knowledge of Epstein's crimes and has publicly expressed regret over their past association. He reportedly apologised to foundation employees in a February town-hall meeting and testified before the House committee on oversight and reform in June, stating he 'never witnessed nor had any indication' of Epstein's ongoing criminal conduct.

According to Mr. Gates, he was introduced to Epstein in 2011 by trusted associates in his professional and philanthropic circles. Epstein had allegedly claimed he could secure billions of pounds for global health initiatives. Mr. Gates admitted to being aware of Epstein's prior legal issues, referring to his 2008 guilty plea in Florida for soliciting prostitution, including with a minor, but stated he 'did not fully understand the extent of the crimes he committed' and accepted the introduction without sufficient scrutiny. The report suggests Epstein was introduced to Gates and other foundation personnel by an advisor holding dual roles at the foundation and Mr. Gates's personal office. Interactions reportedly ceased in December 2014.

Why this matters: The findings of this review are significant for the reputation and operational transparency of one of the world's largest philanthropic organisations. It underscores the importance of due diligence in partnerships, even for high-profile figures.

What this means for you: What this means for you: While this story primarily concerns the Gates Foundation, it highlights broader issues of accountability and the potential for reputational damage when organisations associate with individuals involved in serious misconduct. It can influence public trust in large charitable organisations and their governance.

Related Articles

Get the news that matters.

Join thousands of readers getting the best of British news straight to their inbox.