Facebook
Britain's News Portal
Around The Clock
BREAKING
Loading latest headlines…

Jackdaw Gas Field Emissions 'Not Material' to Climate, Says Owner

Adura, co-owner of the Jackdaw gas field, claims its emissions will have a negligible impact on global warming. This new assessment was mandated by the industry regulator and follows a legal challenge.

  • Adura's updated Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) states Jackdaw will account for less than 0.02% of annual global greenhouse gases.
  • The assessment was required by the Offshore Petroleum Regulator for Environment and Decommissioning (Opred) after a previous submission was deemed inadequate.
  • A judge had previously ruled ministerial consent for Jackdaw unlawful, following a challenge from environmental groups.
  • Adura argues domestic gas production from Jackdaw could reduce emissions compared to importing Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG).

The Jackdaw gas field's emissions will contribute less than 0.02% to global greenhouse gas emissions over its operational lifetime, according to a revised Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) submitted by its owner, Adura. This estimate was mandated by the Offshore Petroleum Regulator for Environment and Decommissioning (Opred), which identified deficiencies in previous submissions following a judicial ruling last year that deemed ministerial consent unlawful.

The report outlines how utilising gas from the Jackdaw field domestically could reduce CO2 emissions equivalent to approximately four million tonnes, as opposed to importing Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) which carries an emission penalty of around 20% more. This discrepancy arises from the energy-intensive processes involved in liquefaction, transport, and regasification.

Adura's submission asserts that the climate impacts will be 'minor' due to the UK's well-regulated industry with targets aligned with the Paris Agreement aims. The company cites the UK's commitment to limiting global warming to between 1.5 and 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels as a justification for its stance.

Last year, the Court of Session in Edinburgh found that both the Jackdaw and Rosebank oil and gas fields had been unlawfully approved due to inadequate consideration of climate impacts by the government. Lord Ericht specifically called for a more detailed climate assessment and fresh approval before any production could commence.

Why this matters: This story is crucial as it highlights the ongoing debate between energy security and climate commitments within the UK. The approval of new fossil fuel projects has significant implications for the country's net-zero targets and international climate standing.

What this means for you: What this means for you: This development could influence future energy prices and the UK's reliance on imported gas, potentially affecting your household bills and the broader progress towards a greener economy.

Related Articles

Get the news that matters.

Join thousands of readers getting the best of British news straight to their inbox.