Facebook
Britain's News Portal
Around The Clock
BREAKING
Loading latest headlines…

MI5 Accused of Lying to Courts Over Neo-Nazi Informant Case

A new report by Sir John Goldring criticises senior MI5 figures for giving false evidence to courts regarding a violent neo-Nazi spy. The findings confirm earlier BBC revelations and could lead to severe repercussions for the security service.

  • MI5 provided evidence based on 'lies' to three courts while defending a violent neo-Nazi informant.
  • The report by Sir John Goldring heavily criticises senior MI5 officers, including one who repeatedly lied and another who misled colleagues.
  • The security service's Director General, Sir Ken McCallum, has apologised for the incorrect evidence and delay in addressing the issue.
  • Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood stated she is taking urgent action to hold MI5 accountable for these serious failings.
  • The investigation stemmed from a High Court rejection of MI5's explanations and could result in contempt of court proceedings or criminal prosecution.

A damning official report has concluded that MI5 presented evidence based on "lies" to three courts while defending a violent neo-Nazi informant. The report, authored by deputy investigatory powers commissioner Sir John Goldring, delivers severe criticism against several senior MI5 figures and the organisation as a whole, plunging the security service into a significant crisis.

Sir John's investigation, ordered by the Prime Minister in September 2025 after the High Court dismissed MI5's explanations as insufficient, confirms revelations made by the BBC in February 2025 that MI5 had lied to the courts – an accusation the security service had previously vehemently denied. The report highlights that one senior MI5 officer repeatedly lied, while another misled colleagues and misrepresented information they had received.

The core of the issue revolves around MI5's adherence to its 'neither confirm nor deny' (NCND) policy regarding the agent status of the violent neo-Nazi informant. MI5 falsely claimed to the courts that it had maintained this policy, which consequently allowed it to withhold information from a woman who had been abused by the informant. However, the report found that MI5 had in fact disclosed the man's agent status in phone calls in 2020.

Specific criticisms within the report detail that a senior MI5 officer, identified as Officer 2, repeatedly told "lies" which formed the basis of MI5's false account to the courts. Officer 2 allegedly presented a "wholly fictitious account" denying ever disclosing the agent's status. Another senior officer, Officer 3, is criticised for misleading colleagues and not acting in good faith, bearing "considerable responsibility for the continuation of MI5's falsehood". Furthermore, an MI5 deputy director, Witness A, is cited for overstating matters in an internal meeting, contributing to the reliance on the false account.

MI5 Director General Sir Ken McCallum acknowledged the gravity of the failings, stating, "MI5 recognises without hesitation the seriousness of our failings in these proceedings." He reiterated apologies to the courts for the incorrect evidence and the organisation's slow response. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood described the report's findings as "stark" and confirmed she is taking "urgent action to hold MI5 to account for these failures, including strengthening my oversight and assurance of their work."

Why this matters: This report raises serious questions about the integrity and accountability of one of the UK's most critical security organisations, potentially eroding public trust and undermining the justice system.

What this means for you: What this means for you: This incident could prompt reforms in how UK intelligence services operate and are held accountable, potentially strengthening safeguards to prevent similar abuses of power and ensure justice.

Related Articles

Get the news that matters.

Join thousands of readers getting the best of British news straight to their inbox.