Facebook
Britain's News Portal
Around The Clock
BREAKING
Loading latest headlines…

Misan Harriman to Step Down as Southbank Centre Chair This Autumn

Misan Harriman will not seek re-election as chair of the Southbank Centre, confirming his departure this autumn. The decision follows a month of scrutiny over his social media posts, though the Southbank Centre states the decision was made in January.

  • Misan Harriman will step down as Southbank Centre chair in autumn, having served since 2021.
  • He stated he had decided to serve two terms 'way before this madness' of recent controversies.
  • Harriman faced criticism for social media posts, including one questioning coverage of the Golders Green attack and comments after local election results.
  • The Southbank Centre confirmed Harriman's decision to depart was made in January, prior to recent media scrutiny.
  • Succession planning for the next chair is already underway.

Misan Harriman's departure as chair of London's revered Southbank Centre is set to send shockwaves through the cultural scene this autumn. The high-profile exit, confirmed in a social media post, marks the end of a tenure that was marked by controversy and intense public scrutiny.

The drama surrounding Harriman's time at the helm has been as explosive as a top-flight football match, with his every move under the microscope. Accusations flew thick and fast after he shared a post questioning the media coverage given to the Muslim victim in the Golders Green attack, sparking fears that it downplayed the antisemitic nature of the incident. Then came the storm over England's local election results, when Harriman waded into controversy by comparing Reform voters' gains to the Holocaust, quoting Susan Sontag in a video that ignited outrage.

But the Southbank Centre is adamant that Harriman's decision to step down was made long before the recent media furore. A spokesperson insisted that his departure is unrelated to the 'antisemitism' row, claiming it was communicated to the deputy chair as far back as January. The embattled chair himself seemed to allude to the chaos in a video, but stopped short of directly addressing the allegations.

Harriman's tenure has been marked by some notable successes, including Harry Styles' Meltdown festival and exhibitions by artists such as Anish Kapoor and Nan Goldin. He hailed the Southbank Centre as 'sacred 11 acres', expressing pride in his role as chair and highlighting its strong health under his leadership – a sentiment that may be put to the test as the institution prepares to celebrate its 75th anniversary in 2026.

The controversy surrounding Harriman's comments has left the cultural sector on high alert, with concerns about the potential impact on public funding and corporate sponsorship. Editorials have warned of damage to the centre's reputation, deterring sponsors and threatening its future viability. But not everyone is convinced – an open letter signed by figures including Greta Thunberg and Gary Lineker has defended Harriman, accusing critics of a 'dishonest smear campaign'.

The Southbank Centre is already planning for life after Harriman, with succession details expected to emerge after their Annual General Meeting in July. Meanwhile, he's taken his battle with the media to the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), lodging an official complaint over the coverage of his tenure.

Why this matters: The leadership of major cultural institutions like the Southbank Centre can significantly influence their direction, public perception, and ability to secure funding, which in turn affects the availability and diversity of arts and cultural programmes for UK audiences. Public commentary by high-profile figures in such roles can also spark wider debates about freedom of speech and institutional responsibility.

What this means for you: What this means for you: As a UK taxpayer, you indirectly contribute to the funding of organisations like the Southbank Centre. Changes in leadership and public controversies can influence how these institutions are run and perceived, potentially affecting the cultural offerings available and how public funds are utilised.

Related Articles

Get the news that matters.

Join thousands of readers getting the best of British news straight to their inbox.