The government's proposed overhaul of the SEND system has sparked a heated debate, with Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson firing a warning shot at lawyers representing families of children with special educational needs. Speaking at the ASCL conference, Ms Phillipson accused lawyers of profiteering from the "failed" and "adversarial" current system, which she claims disproportionately benefits wealthier parents who can afford legal representation.
The government's new policy framework aims to move more children with conditions like autism or ADHD into mainstream schools, rather than specialised institutions. Ms Phillipson asserted that this change is evidence-backed and supported by educational professionals, but has met fierce opposition from lawyers, who she claimed have a "vested interest" in maintaining the status quo.
Ms Phillipson directly addressed the legal profession's criticisms, stating that they are motivated by profit rather than a genuine desire to support families. She reiterated her belief that the government's approach prioritises earlier intervention and a fairer system of support for all families, regardless of their financial means.
The proposed changes also include capping local council spending on fees for private special schools, which has raised concerns about potential closures. However, Ms Phillipson dismissed these fears, arguing that it is necessary to "clamp down" on the increased income of independent specialist provision, which often prioritises profits over quality and outcomes for children.
Earlier in the conference, Jo Rowley expressed concern that the reforms could shift the focus from local authorities to direct conflicts between families and schools. Ms Phillipson responded by emphasising the importance of a collective response and parents' responsibility to support their child's school.