Facebook
Britain's News Portal
Around The Clock
BREAKING
Loading latest headlines…

Police Drummer Stewart Copeland: Relationship with Sting 'Fine' Amidst Royalties Row

The Police drummer Stewart Copeland says he and Sting 'get along just fine' despite an ongoing legal dispute over unpaid royalties. This comes after Copeland and Andy Summers launched legal action against Sting and his publishing company.

  • Stewart Copeland states he and Sting maintain a good relationship despite the legal battle.
  • Copeland and Andy Summers are suing Sting for alleged unpaid royalties between £1.5 million and £8 million.
  • The dispute centres on whether streaming and download income should be categorised as 'public performance' or 'sales'.

The high-stakes battle between The Police's founding members has taken a new twist – with drummer Stewart Copeland insisting his relationship with Sting remains 'fine' despite the simmering royalties row. Behind closed doors, it seems, the two musical maestros are still swapping banter and discussing everyday life, rather than getting bogged down in the bean-counters' battle over millions.

But make no mistake – the war of numbers has only just begun! Last year's lawsuit, launched by Copeland and guitarist Andy Summers, is a fight for fair shares from Sting's lucrative royalties. They claim he owes them between £1.5 million and £8 million in unpaid dosh – with lawyers warning this figure could rise even further as interest kicks in on the alleged 'historic underpayment'.

The elephant in the room? The classification of cash from streaming and digital downloads. Sting's team argues these should be seen as 'public performances', not sales, which would affect how royalties are doled out. But Copeland and Summers counter that their contributions to some of The Police's most iconic tracks – like 'Every Breath You Take' (which rakes in a staggering £550,000 per annum for Sting alone) – earn them 'arranger's fees'. They want a share from the lucrative digital exploitation of their band's back catalogue.

Sting has indeed coughed up over £598,000 in royalties since the lawsuit landed on his doorstep last September. Yet this payment hasn't quelled the flames – the underlying dispute over who gets what remains unresolved. As the music industry grapples with its complex financial structures and shifting digital landscapes, one thing's for sure: this case is a wake-up call for legacy artists in an ever-changing world.

Why this matters: This dispute illustrates the ongoing complexities of royalty payments in the digital age, affecting artists' earnings and potentially setting precedents for how music rights are managed. For UK artists and rights holders, the outcome could influence future contractual agreements and income streams.

What this means for you: What this means for you: While this specific dispute doesn't directly affect UK households or businesses, it underscores the evolving financial landscape for creative industries. For those involved in music or other creative fields, it highlights the importance of clear contractual agreements regarding digital income and intellectual property.

Related Articles

Get the news that matters.

Join thousands of readers getting the best of British news straight to their inbox.