Facebook
Britain's News Portal
Around The Clock
BREAKING
Loading latest headlines…

Trump Administration Accused of 'Stacking' Chemical Safety Board with Industry Figures

Public health advocates are raising concerns about the Trump administration's appointments to a key chemical safety board, alleging conflicts of interest. Critics warn the move could undermine protections against toxic chemicals and provide justification for deregulation.

  • The Trump administration is accused of appointing industry-aligned scientists to the Environmental Protection Agency's Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC).
  • Public health groups allege that at least 13 proposed appointees have conflicts of interest with chemicals slated for review.
  • Concerns are raised that the new composition of the SACC could lead to a 'rubber-stamping' of industry-favourable scientific research.
  • Federal law and EPA guidelines state that the SACC must be balanced and free of conflicts of interest.
  • One appointee, Wade Barranco, is employed by a company that released significant amounts of chemicals likely to be reviewed by the SACC.

The Trump administration's appointment of industry-friendly experts to a key chemical safety board has sparked concerns about a deliberate attempt to 'stack' the panel in favour of big business. Critics argue that at least 13 of the proposed members have close ties to chemical companies, undermining the impartiality required for effective regulation. This move comes as the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) prepares to review crucial safety data on chemicals such as acetaldehyde and benzene.

A coalition of public health advocacy groups has submitted comments to the EPA, highlighting the potential conflicts of interest among the new appointees. According to federal law and the agency's own guidelines, the SACC must be comprised of experts who are both balanced and free from perceived or actual conflicts of interest. The critics assert that these appointments are part of a broader strategy to dismantle protections against toxic chemicals.

Among those appointed is Wade Barranco, a Lyondell Chemical Company employee who was responsible for releasing nearly 1 million pounds of hazardous substances in 2024. Erik D Olson, senior strategic director at the Natural Resources Defense Council, described Barranco and others like him as "mouthpieces" for the chemical industry.

The SACC's role is to ensure that the EPA's decisions on regulating chemicals are based on the best available science. While industry representation has traditionally been a part of the committee, the newly proposed board appears to be heavily skewed towards corporate interests. Kyla Bennett, a former EPA scientist now with Public Employees for Responsibility, warned that an industry-dominated SACC would likely rubber-stamp research favourable to industry positions.

To support their claims, the public health coalition analysed data from the EPA's chemical reporting database and toxics release inventory, identifying companies with connections to the proposed appointees. This includes Lyondell Chemical Company, which has reported making or releasing several chemicals slated for SACC review.

Why this matters: While this issue directly concerns US chemical safety, the implications of weakened environmental protection standards in a major global economy could have wider repercussions. It could influence international regulatory approaches and potentially impact the availability and safety of products globally.

What this means for you: What this means for you: While this specific issue is US-focused, the global nature of chemical production and trade means that changes to safety standards in one major economy could indirectly affect the types of chemicals used in products imported into the UK, or influence international regulatory dialogues that impact UK policy.

Related Articles

Get the news that matters.

Join thousands of readers getting the best of British news straight to their inbox.