Facebook
Britain's News Portal
Around The Clock
BREAKING
Loading latest headlines…

Uber Labels £340m London Cabbie Lawsuit 'Completely Unfounded' as Trial Begins

Uber has dismissed a £340m lawsuit from London black cab drivers as 'completely unfounded' during a preliminary High Court hearing. The case, involving 13,000 drivers, alleges Uber operated unlawfully between 2012 and 2018.

  • Uber is facing a £340m lawsuit from 13,000 London black cab drivers.
  • The lawsuit alleges Uber operated unlawfully between 2012 and March 2018, causing lost earnings for cabbies.
  • Uber argues the claims, filed in 2024, are 'time-barred' and fall outside the six-year limitation period.
  • The current High Court hearing will determine if the claims are out of time, rather than their underlying merit.
  • If Uber succeeds on the limitation issue, the entire £340m claim will be dismissed.

Ride-hailing giant Uber has been dealt a blow as it prepares to defend a £340m lawsuit brought by thousands of London black cab drivers. The company's lawyers have been forced to admit, in court documents, that the claimants' solicitors had already begun exploring a potential class action and collecting financial information from drivers months before a key licensing appeal in June 2018.

The collective action involves approximately 13,000 black cab drivers, alongside claims linked to former private hire operators Kabbee and Iride. They are seeking substantial damages, alleging that Uber obtained and operated under its Transport for London (TfL) licence unlawfully from 2012 until March 2018.

An Uber spokesperson maintained the company operates lawfully in London, is fully licensed by TfL, and serves millions of passengers and drivers. However, documents filed ahead of the hearing show that the firm's team will argue that the claimants had ample opportunity to investigate and bring proceedings much earlier, well outside the six-year limitation period stipulated by law.

The High Court has been directed to assume, for the purposes of this preliminary trial, that the underlying allegations of Uber’s operating model breaching London’s private hire licensing regime are true. The sole focus will be on whether the claimants could have, with reasonable diligence, brought their case sooner. If Uber succeeds on this limitation issue, the entire £340m claim will be dismissed without the court ever considering the merits of the drivers’ allegations.

Why this matters: This case could have significant implications for the gig economy and competition law in the UK, potentially setting a precedent for how tech companies operate within established regulatory frameworks. The outcome will also be closely watched by other industries facing disruption from digital platforms.

What this means for you: What this means for you: If you are a regular user of ride-hailing services or a black cab passenger in London, the outcome of this case could influence the future regulatory landscape for private hire vehicles and potentially impact service availability and pricing in the capital.

Related Articles

Get the news that matters.

Join thousands of readers getting the best of British news straight to their inbox.