The United Nations' 62nd Human Rights Council meeting in Geneva has seen a draft resolution on protecting healthcare in conflict zones come under scrutiny from the UK. Despite its praise for Qatar's work on the draft (L.26) and acknowledging efforts to incorporate feedback, the British delegation sought clarification on certain aspects of the text.
The UK reaffirmed its unwavering commitment to safeguarding medical personnel, facilities, and civilians – including humanitarian workers – in conflict zones, aligning with UN Security Council Resolution 2286 adopted a decade ago. However, the number of medical personnel and patients killed in conflict areas reached record levels in 2025, a situation the UK described as deeply concerning.
A key concern for the UK revolves around distinguishing between international humanitarian law (IHL) and international human rights law (IHRL). While acknowledging their complementary nature, the UK stressed that these frameworks remain distinct legal systems with different sources, scopes, and obligations. Preserving this distinction is seen as crucial for maintaining legal clarity and ensuring coherent application of international law.
The UK delegation noted that IHL specifically provides protections for the wounded, sick, medical personnel, and medical facilities, rather than establishing a standalone right to healthcare. The British government suggested that certain parts of the draft resolution could be interpreted as attempting to extend or modify existing legal obligations beyond their established scope, potentially leading to unintended consequences in international law practice.
The UK also reaffirmed its commitment to the progressive realisation of the right to the highest attainable standard of health. The Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office regularly issues travel advice for British nationals, particularly in regions affected by armed conflict, often highlighting dangers to civilians and humanitarian workers. The UK's stance underscores its dedication to upholding the rule of law in international relations and ensuring humanitarian efforts can be conducted effectively within established legal parameters.