Facebook
Britain's News Portal
Around The Clock
BREAKING
Loading latest headlines…

US Supreme Court Justice Jackson Criticises 'Shadow Docket' Use

US Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has voiced concerns regarding the court's handling of emergency requests, often used by the Trump administration.

  • Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson criticised the US Supreme Court's use of the 'shadow docket' for emergency requests.
  • Her comments followed the Trump administration's latest emergency request concerning immigrant deportations.
  • The Trump administration has filed over 30 emergency requests since January 2025, many of which have been granted.

US Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has expressed serious concerns about her colleagues' approach to emergency requests, a method frequently utilised by Donald Trump to seek court approval. Justice Jackson, one of the court's three liberal members, criticised the justices' readiness to issue rulings via the "shadow docket," stating that it erodes public trust in the judicial system.

Speaking on Thursday at the University of the District of Columbia's David A Clarke School of Law, Justice Jackson remarked, "There is a serious concern that the supreme court’s modern stay practices are having a disruptive and potentially corrosive effect." Her comments were made hours after the Trump administration submitted its latest emergency request, seeking permission to continue deporting immigrants to countries other than their own.

The emergency docket, also known as the "shadow docket," allows plaintiffs to seek immediate relief from the Supreme Court in significant cases. Justices can quickly grant or dismiss these requests without the extensive legal review typically required for merit cases or providing detailed public explanations. The Trump administration has used this method to advance its agenda, filing more than 30 emergency requests since January 2025, with many being granted.

Justice Jackson noted that while the court "began to explain more," it was "still not the full kind of explanation" provided for cases on the merits docket. She warned that "If we’re not careful, the emergency docket can and will become an end-run around the standard review process."

Why this matters: The criticism from a sitting justice highlights concerns about transparency and due process in the US Supreme Court's handling of significant legal matters, particularly those affecting government policy.

Related Articles

Get the news that matters.

Join thousands of readers getting the best of British news straight to their inbox.