Facebook
Britain's News Portal
Around The Clock
BREAKING
Loading latest headlines…

Why does the French Open still refuse to use electronic line calling?

Roland Garros remains the only Grand Slam tournament without ball-tracking technology, relying instead on human line judges. The decision has sparked fresh debate among players and fans after several controversial calls during this year's clay-court season.

  • The French Open is the only Grand Slam that does not use Hawk-Eye or any electronic line-calling system.
  • Tournament officials cite tradition and the unique challenge of clay-court marks as reasons for the policy.
  • Players including Andy Murray have called for change, while others argue the human element adds character.

As the tennis world descends on Paris for the French Open, a familiar debate has resurfaced: why does Roland Garros remain the only Grand Slam tournament without electronic line calling? While the Australian Open, Wimbledon, and the US Open have all adopted Hawk-Eye or similar ball-tracking systems, the clay courts of Paris still rely solely on human line judges and the contested ball mark left in the terre battue.

The French Tennis Federation (FFT) has long defended the policy, arguing that the clay surface leaves a visible imprint of where the ball lands, making the mark itself the most accurate form of evidence. 'On clay, you can see the mark. It is part of the tradition and the spectacle of the tournament,' an FFT spokesperson said. However, critics point out that players and umpires often disagree over which mark is the correct one, leading to lengthy and sometimes heated disputes.

Former world number one Andy Murray, now competing in his final French Open, has been a vocal advocate for change. 'It's frustrating when you see other tournaments getting it right every time, and here we're still arguing about marks in the dirt,' he said earlier this week. 'It feels outdated, especially when the technology exists and is proven.' Other players, including Novak Djokovic, have expressed mixed views, acknowledging the charm of the tradition while admitting that mistakes can be costly.

The absence of electronic calling also has a direct impact on the rhythm of matches. Without automated 'out' calls, players must challenge calls by asking the umpire to inspect a mark, a process that can take up to 30 seconds per dispute. This contrasts sharply with the instant feedback at Wimbledon and the Australian Open, where Hawk-Eye Live is used for all calls except lets and net cords. The slower pace has drawn criticism from broadcasters and fans, who argue it disrupts the flow of play.

For British tennis fans, the issue carries particular weight this year as the country's top players, including Jack Draper and Katie Boulter, navigate the unique challenges of the Parisian clay. Boulter, who reached the third round last year, admitted that adapting to the lack of technology was 'part of the mental battle' of the tournament. 'You have to be ready for those moments where a call doesn't go your way, and you can't rely on a challenge system,' she said.

Why this matters: For UK tennis fans watching the French Open on Eurosport or BBC, the absence of electronic line calling means more disputed calls, longer matches, and a different viewing experience compared to Wimbledon. It also affects the performance of British players who must adapt to a system that many consider outdated.

What this means for you: What this means for you: If you're watching the French Open, expect more pauses for disputed line calls and a slower pace of play compared to Wimbledon. British players will need to adjust their mental game to cope with the lack of electronic challenges.

Related Articles

Get the news that matters.

Join thousands of readers getting the best of British news straight to their inbox.