Facebook
Britain's News Portal
Around The Clock
BREAKING
Loading latest headlines…

D4vd Court Hearing: Slain Teen's Final Texts Revealed Before Death

Prosecutors in Los Angeles have presented a detailed account of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez's final night, including text messages exchanged with singer D4vd. The hearing will determine if D4vd, whose legal name is David Burke, will face trial for murder, child sexual abuse, and body mutilation.

  • Prosecutors presented text messages between Celeste Rivas Hernandez and D4vd (David Burke) during a pre-trial hearing.
  • Rivas Hernandez's phone went silent upon arriving at D4vd's Hollywood home on 23 April 2025, according to court evidence.
  • D4vd faces charges of murder, sexual abuse of a child under 14, and mutilation of a body; he has pleaded not guilty.
  • DNA matching Rivas Hernandez was found in D4vd's garage, and her body was later discovered in his Tesla.
  • The hearing's final day saw closing arguments before Judge Charlaine Olmedo decides on a trial.

Los Angeles prosecutors have given a moment-by-moment account of the final hours of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez, presenting a stream of text messages exchanged with the singer D4vd, whose legal name is David Burke. The court heard that her phone went permanently silent shortly after she arrived at his Hollywood home on 23 April 2025. This detailed timeline was presented on what is expected to be the concluding day of a Los Angeles hearing, which will determine whether Burke will proceed to trial in connection with her death.

During the proceedings, Detective Corey Farrell of the Los Angeles Police Department read out the text messages, which were obtained through warrants on Burke’s iPhone and iCloud accounts. The prosecution highlighted a final text from Rivas Hernandez as she neared Burke's residence, sent via an Uber he had reportedly dispatched for her: “girly pop i’m almost there open ur door if ur home.” Prosecutors allege that Burke, 21, subsequently stabbed her to death upon her entry.

The court was also shown texts from the night before, revealing an argument between Rivas Hernandez and Burke concerning his relationship with another woman. In an angry and profane message, Rivas Hernandez reportedly threatened to “end ur career and ur life” and tell her father numerous lies about him. Defence attorneys, however, presented other texts from Rivas Hernandez threatening to go to Burke’s mother, speak to his friends, and “leak” information, but established she never threatened police or legal action.

The defence also pointed out that no witnesses or cameras captured Rivas Hernandez entering the house or Burke being present at the specific time prosecutors allege she was killed. Detective Farrell confirmed under questioning that the parents of both Burke and Rivas Hernandez were aware of their relationship, and that Burke had attended church with members of her family. He also acknowledged that Rivas Hernandez had initially misrepresented her age to Burke, stating she was 16 when she was 11, and later claiming to be 18.

Following the silence from Rivas Hernandez’s phone, Burke reportedly sent several messages later that night, inquiring about her whereabouts and expressing concern. Prosecutors contend these messages were sent as a cover-up after her death. Earlier in the hearing, a police analyst testified that samples from apparent bloodstains in Burke’s garage matched Rivas Hernandez’s DNA. Her body was eventually discovered in a Tesla registered to Burke nearly five months after her disappearance. Both sides have now concluded their questioning of Detective Farrell, the hearing’s final witness, and are preparing for closing arguments before Judge Charlaine Olmedo makes her decision on whether to send Burke to trial on charges of murder, sexual abuse of a child under 14, and mutilation of a body. Burke has pleaded not guilty, with his lawyers maintaining he did not cause her death.

Why this matters: This high-profile case involving a popular online musician and serious allegations of violence against a minor has drawn significant public attention, highlighting concerns around online relationships and the safety of young people.

What this means for you: This case serves as a stark reminder of the potential dangers in online interactions, particularly for young people, and could prompt discussions about safeguarding measures and parental oversight in the digital age.

Related Articles

Get the news that matters.

Join thousands of readers getting the best of British news straight to their inbox.