Facebook
Britain's News Portal
Around The Clock
BREAKING
Loading latest headlines…

Federal judge calls Flock 'indiscriminate mass surveillance'

A federal judge ruled that a Tulsa sheriff's deputy violated a woman's Fourth Amendment rights by searching the Flock Safety database for her license plate without a warrant, and suppressed the evidence obtained afterwards.

  • Judge Sara Hill ruled the deputy had 'no apparent reason' for the search other than the woman's California license plate.
  • Hill wrote that evidence obtained after the Flock search 'must be suppressed as the fruit of a poisonous tree'.
  • The ruling does not create binding precedent but is one of the first times a federal judge has ruled a Flock search unconstitutional.

A federal judge ruled this week that a Tulsa, Oklahoma sheriff's deputy violated a woman's Fourth Amendment rights when using Flock Safety to search for her license plate without a warrant.

As reported by 404 Media, the ruling does not create binding precedent, but it is one of the first times a federal judge has ruled that a Flock search is unconstitutional.

Judge Sara Hill said the deputy should have obtained a warrant before searching the Flock database for the woman's license plate, as he had "no apparent reason" for the search "other than the fact that [the woman's vehicle] had a California license plate." The deputy then used the woman's travel history in Flock as part of the justification for searching her car, where he allegedly discovered 91 pounds of meth. Judge Hill wrote that all evidence obtained after the Flock search "must be suppressed as the fruit of a poisonous tree."

Judge Hill also took broader aim at warrantless searches of the Flock database, writing that tracking people's location — even when they're in public places — becomes "constitutionally problematic when law enforcement can indiscriminately and passively catalog your whereabouts over an extended period of time and then use that information for any purpose whenever convenient."

"This is a type of indiscriminate mass surveillance," Hill wrote. "It is not targeted on a single individual, as in [Carpenter v. United States]. It is a tool that collects information about all vehicles that pass by any network-connected camera at all times, and it serves up the information to law enforcement on demand."

Hill joins a growing chorus of Flock critics from across the political spectrum. Numerous local and state governments, including Florida and Texas, have said they will stop using the technology. On Friday, Senator Bernie Sanders — a Democrat from Vermont — introduced the Block Flock Act, which would bar federal agencies from using automated license plate readers such as Flock.

Flock CEO Garretty Langley has called for a "compromise" between privacy and safety and offered an apology to women who have been stalked by law enforcement officers using the Flock system. With all those cancellations, Flock has also reportedly offered voluntary employee buyouts as a way to shrink its workforce.

Why this matters: The ruling adds to scrutiny of automated license plate readers, with some local and state governments saying they will stop using Flock and a US senator introducing legislation to bar federal agencies from using such systems.

Related Articles

Get the news that matters.

Join thousands of readers getting the best of British news straight to their inbox.