Police forces across the UK could face strict new legal limits on their use of live facial recognition technology after campaigners took their fight to the High Court.
Civil liberties groups argued that current regulations are inadequate, warning the technology risks creating widespread surveillance that infringes on privacy and freedom of expression. Without proper legal restrictions, they claim police deployment of the controversial technology amounts to a "wild west" scenario.
The legal challenge exposes how officers currently rely on existing laws and internal guidelines rather than specific legislation governing live facial recognition. Critics told the court this creates insufficient safeguards against potential overreach.
Law enforcement agencies defend the technology as vital for preventing serious crime, finding missing persons, and protecting public safety during large gatherings. They insist its use is proportionate and necessary in high-threat situations.
However, campaigners highlighted risks including misidentification and the creation of extensive biometric databases, with particular concerns about impact on minority communities.
The case could set a crucial precedent for regulating emerging surveillance technologies across UK policing. Any ruling may shape future legislation governing artificial intelligence use by public bodies, potentially redefining the balance between security needs and civil liberties protection.