A growing trend in home grooming is transforming lives with Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) and laser devices, promising smoother skin and reduced regrowth – a welcome alternative to traditional methods. For those considering these treatments at home, understanding which devices deliver on their promises is crucial.
A recent comprehensive review assessed 13 of the most popular at-home IPL and laser devices available in the UK, covering various price points. The testing process involved using each device for three full sessions on the same area, meticulously recording treatment duration, post-treatment skin sensation, and the extent of regrowth after each session. A 'control' area was left untreated to provide a direct comparison for regrowth assessment. Factors such as device weight, dimensions, ease of handling, flash rate, and total number of flashes (indicating product lifetime) were also evaluated.
Among the top performers, the Philips Lumea 9900 emerged as the best overall IPL device for both face and body, suggesting a versatile and effective option for consumers seeking a comprehensive solution. For those on a tighter budget, the Bondi Body v2 laser @home – an IPL device despite its name – was recommended as the best budget-friendly option, praised for its compact size and user-friendly design. However, it's worth noting that this device has limitations regarding the range of skin and hair colours it can effectively treat.
The review also highlighted the Silk'n 7 as a standout for its suitability across a broader spectrum of skin and hair types, addressing a common challenge with IPL technology. For consumers specifically seeking a laser hair removal device, the Tria 4X hair removal laser was rated as the best in its category. These distinctions are crucial for UK consumers, as the effectiveness of IPL and laser devices can vary significantly depending on individual skin tone and hair colour.
The increasing accessibility of these technologies at home represents a notable shift in personal grooming. While the initial outlay for some devices can be substantial, the promise of long-term hair reduction and the convenience of at-home treatments could offer a cost-effective and time-saving alternative to salon visits for many UK adults. Consumers are advised to carefully consider their skin and hair type against device specifications before purchasing to ensure optimal results.