New documents have brought to light that Technology Secretary Michelle Donelan's speech on artificial intelligence was modified to incorporate 'more positive language' following advice from Global Counsel, an advisory firm. The firm, co-founded by Labour veteran Lord Mandelson, also represents several prominent AI companies, leading to questions about the extent of influence exerted by private consultancies on government policy.
The alterations to Ms Donelan's speech, which outlined the government's approach to AI regulation and innovation, occurred ahead of a significant address. Critics suggest that the involvement of a firm with commercial ties to the very industry being discussed by the Secretary of State could create a perception of potential conflict of interest, particularly when the advice directly impacts the tone and content of ministerial statements.
Global Counsel has confirmed that it provided advice to the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) on the speech. The firm maintains that its role was to offer strategic communications guidance and that all engagements were conducted transparently and appropriately. Lord Mandelson, a former Cabinet minister, co-founded the firm, which offers political and economic advice to businesses and organisations globally.
The Labour Party has called for greater transparency regarding the interactions between government departments and advisory firms, especially those with vested interests in the sectors they are advising on. A spokesperson highlighted the importance of ensuring that government policy is developed free from undue influence and serves the public interest above all else.
A government spokesperson for DSIT stated that it is common practice for departments to seek external advice to ensure comprehensive and well-informed policy development. They asserted that all advice received is scrutinised and that the government's AI strategy remains focused on promoting safe innovation while protecting the public.
This revelation comes at a time when the UK government is positioning itself as a leader in global AI governance, having hosted the inaugural AI Safety Summit. The perceived closeness between policymakers and industry lobbyists could complicate efforts to build trust and demonstrate impartiality in developing crucial regulatory frameworks for rapidly advancing technologies.