The Prime Minister's proposed ban on social media access for under-16s has sparked intense debate among teenagers, who are caught in a web of conflicting views on the risks versus benefits of these platforms. For many, social media is both a source of creative opportunity and a haven for online abuse.
Ziame Stewart, 15, who is set to turn 16 just before the new rules come into force next spring, has built a reputation as a singer and dancer on social media. He fears that without these platforms, promoting his work and engaging with fans would become significantly more challenging - potentially derailing his budding career.
Others acknowledge the darker side of online interactions, but also highlight their importance for vulnerable young people. Harry Sawtell, 16, a beauty influencer with over 100,000 followers, has personally experienced the cruelty that social media can harbour, particularly as a gay teenager. However, he notes that platforms also offer crucial avenues for connection and support.
Miley Williams, 14, who earns around £400 a month from her social media presence through brand deals and content creation, holds conflicting views on the impending ban. Having built a following from a viral video, she fears it could impact her modest income and future prospects - highlighting how social media has evolved beyond a hobby for some young people.
The government's stance, as articulated by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, is that tech giants have failed to make their platforms adequately safe despite ample opportunity. The UK is aligning with countries like Australia in its push for stricter regulations, including further restrictions for 16 and 17-year-olds expected to be announced next month.
While the policy aims to shield children from harm, the voices of teenagers reveal a complex landscape where social media is both a source of risk and a platform for creative opportunity.