High-profile reporters have rejected accusations that the media has become addicted to political crises, instead blaming politicians for driving a decade of chaos in Westminster.
In a rare display of unity, leading editors from major UK publications have spoken out against claims that the media is fuelling the country's seemingly endless cycle of leadership changes.
The comments come as Britain could yet appoint its seventh prime minister since the Brexit vote 10 years ago, after the latest Conservative party turmoil.
According to the editors, politicians are the ones 'addicted to crisis', and the media is simply reporting on the reality of the situation.
They argue that the constant speculation and drama surrounding Westminster is a direct result of the government's inability to deliver stable leadership and clear policy.
The comments have sparked a heated debate about the role of the media in reporting on politics, with some arguing that the media is indeed responsible for driving the narrative and fuelling public interest in Westminster scandals.