Facebook
Britain's News Portal
Around The Clock
BREAKING
Loading latest headlines…

US Supreme Court Justice Alito recuses from major climate change case

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a significant climate change case, following calls for him to step aside due to his holdings in oil companies.

  • Justice Alito recused himself from a climate change case on Monday, 28 September 2026.
  • The recusal follows scrutiny over his stock holdings in oil companies, though he does not hold stock in the specific companies involved in this case.
  • The case involves allegations that fossil fuel firms deceived the public about climate change, with billions of dollars in damages potentially at stake.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito recused himself on Monday from a major climate change case. The decision follows calls for him to step aside due to his stock holdings in oil companies.

A letter posted in the case stated, “Justice Alito has determined that he will not continue to participate in this case,” but did not specify a reason. Justice Alito has previously recused himself from other cases involving companies in which he holds stock.

The recusal comes shortly before the court is due to hear a case filed by local officials in Boulder, Colorado, against Suncor Energy and ExxonMobil. This case is one of many similar lawsuits alleging that companies misled the public about the contribution of fossil fuels to climate change, with potential damages amounting to billions of dollars.

The high court had agreed to hear an appeal from the energy companies, which are backed by the Trump administration. The companies argue that the lawsuits pose a serious threat to the industry and that state courts are not the appropriate venue for addressing the global issue of climate change.

According to his disclosures, Justice Alito does not own stock in Suncor Energy and ExxonMobil but does have holdings in other oil companies, including ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66. Consumer Watchdog, a group, suggested that this could mean he might indirectly benefit from a decision favouring the industry. Alexandra Nagy, the group's organising director, stated that Justice Alito's recusal was "the right decision, and one he should have made from the start," referencing the court's code of ethics which advises recusal if a justice or their family has a "subject matter or controversy."

Why this matters: The case involves allegations of deception by fossil fuel companies regarding climate change and could result in billions of dollars in damages.

Related Articles

Get the news that matters.

Join thousands of readers getting the best of British news straight to their inbox.