A senior crown prosecutor acting in a high court case cited an imaginary legal precedent in an error that has sparked fresh concerns about AI hallucinations infecting the justice system. Ravinder Dhillon, representing the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), referenced an entirely made-up case during a dispute over whether a child should be prosecuted for the rape of his younger sister, court documents have revealed.
CPS prosecutor cites imaginary case in high court after AI search
UKPulse News DeskA senior crown prosecutor cited an imaginary legal precedent in a high court case, sparking concerns about AI hallucinations infecting the justice system.
- The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) admitted to citing a nonexistent case in a high court case.
- The error was caused by an AI response generated during an internet search.
- This is the second known case involving the CPS, following a similar incident in February.
Why this matters: The incident raises concerns about the use of AI in the justice system and the potential risks of errors and misused authority.
What this means for you: If you are involved in a court case, be aware that AI-related errors can occur, and it's essential to verify the accuracy of legal authorities cited in your case papers.